Thursday, May 31, 2012

Is Kindness a Strategy?


A friend recently described a remarkable travel experience. Strange to say, the story was about an airline, and it wasn't a travel nightmare. Instead, it involved the recently bankrupt American Airlines doing something extraordinary — by putting kindness to work.

The story came from a colleague of his I'll call Frank. Frank lives in Dallas and was on his way to a board meeting in Boston. Frank was happily driving to Dallas-Fort Worth to make the non-stop when he got caught in glutinous morning traffic. He arrived at DFW late for his flight. The woman behind the counter looked at him, looked at his travel record, looked at the hundred people lined up at security, and informed him that he would never make it to the gate on time.
Most airline personnel would have stopped there and offered to book the next available flight — for a fee. If Frank was late, it was Frank's fault. If he missed his board meeting, that was his problem. Under such circumstances, pristine logic normally rules and mercy has no role.
In this case, this logic was proven wrong. The woman asked if Frank had bags to check. He did not. Hearing that, she suggested firmly that he remove his left shoe and sit on it. She summoned a bellman to rush over with a wheel chair, she put Frank in it with his bags, and she went careening off through security, using an express lane for her "invalid" guest. She took Frank all the way to the gate, and Frank made his flight. He also made the meeting on time — and told the entire board about the "miracle" he'd experienced at DFW.
Crisis averted.
I'm sure many supervisors at American would have issues with their colleague's innovative, if mildly deceptive, solution. But, no matter how you look at it, it was an act of genuine kindness. It's conventional wisdom in business that customers spread bad news five times as far and fast as good news. This, however, was a tale of generosity so dramatic that Frank is surely still telling people all about it.
How did an act of kindness become so compelling? A young woman with a generous and ingenious soul had gone the extra mile to solve Frank's problem. She proved herself a hero. As a result, she exalted American Airlines, too.
In today's socially wired world, positive word of mouth is an ever more prized commodity. Most companies solve problems when the fault lies with the company. For example, Ritz-Carlton Hotels are famous for making every problem into what the organization calls an "opportunity." It's based on the concept, introduced in HBR some two decades ago, that "service recovery" — a company's ability to respond quickly, decisively, and effectively to a service problem of its own making — is a powerful way to increase loyalty among existing customers.
Here's how it works. When a problem occurs, swift and effective resolution can elevate repurchase intent to a level that's actually greater than if the problem had never occurred at all. Every problem, if managed well, is thus an "opportunity" to boost overall loyalty among a company's already loyal customers. Spill soup on a guest in the hotel dining room? Solution: offer on the spot to dry clean the suit or, if the damage is severe, offer to replace it entirely. The customer is delighted; the employee has done the right thing; the hotel raises that customer's lifetime value.
The distinction between American Airlines' solution here and Ritz-Carlton's approach is, however, significant. American resolved a problem where the customer was at fault. In theory, Frank deserved to miss his flight.
It's hard to cite many businesses that make kindness the bedrock of their operating strategies. Frank's story is striking because it's so wildly off the spectrum of expected outcomes.
Now, I'm sure there were extenuating circumstances. Frank flies a lot, so he likely enjoys status in American's frequent flyer program. He's a prosperous senior executive, so he likely looked like an influencer among customers American would like to attract. He was able to make his flight with a relatively modest intervention, making the good deed viable. And the woman surely took pity on him because of his predicament. But, still. Who would expect this from an employee of a bankrupt airline?
Like all case studies, this is but a single data point. But it leaves me wondering what any business might stand to gain if it oriented its associates to look out aggressively for opportunities to perform true acts of kindness for their customers.
Consider the fact that kind acts don't generally add costs — unless you have employees giving away the store. As my colleague James L. Heskett of Harvard Business School observes, it's important to endow workers on the front line with "latitude within limits." Otherwise, a plethora of otherwise innocent acts of kindness could get costly.
But, assuming you've got such guidelines in place, kindness has a strategic role to play, especially when it comes to winning over customers in an intensely competitive and slowly recovering economy.
Just ask Frank. He has a new hands-down favorite airline. It's American. All things considered, that's a powerful outcome.
By Jeffrey F. Rayport, Operating Partner at Castanea Partners, and was formerly a faculty member at Harvard Business School.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

5 Ways to Create More Value


Value exchanged for payment constitutes the most basic aspect of business. It’s why a business exists, how a business survives and why it continues to innovate.
Value, however is not what the business says it is, it’s what the buyer says it is by their willingness to purchase from one business over another and their willingness to meet the price asked by the seller.
Businesses that truly appreciate this understand that one of their primary jobs is to increase value in an attempt to sell more at higher prices.
One way to increase value is to stuff more features into your products and services in an effort to make them seem better than what others have to offer, but the problem with that approach alone is that it’s so easy to copy.
A far better long-term approach is to do the things that make your brand worth more in the market. To be the one that people talk about most.
You do this by committing to creating more value in the lives of your customers through tangible and intangible acts that allow you to build deeper relationships. This is how you build value that can’t be mimicked. This is how you build a brand that attracts customers that expect to pay a premium. This is how you create more value.


Measure
The first way to create more value is to understand the value you already deliver. So often we blissfully go about creating happy customers and doing as promised, without stopping to measure what exactly our client realized from our product or engagement.
The funny thing is, more often than not, they got more than we promised, received value that far exceeded what we felt was a reasonable fee. When you create some form of results review you can start to make real assessments about value and communicate these results as proof over promise.
One of two things should happen when you get serious about measuring value: You’ll discover you are not charging nearly enough or you’ll discover your clients are not getting nearly enough – either way you’ll have the information to confidently readjust your business based on value.

Lead
One of the most potent ways you add value is to lead. Your clients are quite often looking for someone to offer them direction. Take a stand and declare a point of view about your industry that you consistently support and become a leading voice for your point of view. Don’t worry about pleasing everyone, leaders take a stand, welcome all points of view and defend what they believe – and that’s where the value is created.
Create groups in social media for those that are attracted to your point of view. Write article, make presentations, blog and invite others, including your competitors, to share their views.
This kind of thought leadership is how you establish more value for your brand, but it’s also how you build a community that wants to be a part of something more dynamic than the typical me too players in your industry.

Teach
If you’ve learned how to something well, one of the best things you can do for your own growth, and those that follow you, is to teach others how to do it well.
This idea certainly applies to the natural elements of your business offerings, but where the real magic happens is when you expand this concept beyond what anyone would logically expect from your business.
For example, if you sell plumbing supplies, but you’ve figured out how to get a lot of value from your Facebook page, take the time to teach your customers how to do the same.
Bring in experts in every area of your customer’s life and make them available as part of what your brand stands for.

Inspire
Many people draw inspiration from art and creativity. One of the best ways to inspire and differentiate your business is by investing in and caring about great design.
Spend the time, effort, thoughtfulness and, yes, money to get design that inspires.
This is a tricky one because design that inspires is so relative, but know this, great design in your marketing materials, websites, products, packaging, even your invoices, is one of the easiest ways to stand out and differentiate your business. It is an investment that will return many times over.
It’s hard sometimes to convince people that design adds value, but all you need do is look around at most industry leaders in every category to find examples where great design is the leading difference.

Listen
I’ll end with another not so intuitive way to add value – listen to what you customers care about.
I know that seems pretty obvious, but we rarely do it.
Invest in the tools that allow you to monitor everything your customers are saying publicly in social media and invest the time to ask them what they need in face-to-face settings.
When you sit with someone and ask them something meaningful about their life, you shut off your phone, look into their eyes and really focus on and care about what they are telling you – you add value. Nobody listens much anymore and people know when they are being heard.
Doing this in the manner I’ve just described is harder than it sounds, but it’s how you fill your relationships with confidence and that’s a kind of value that people cherish most.

By John Jantsch - Duct Tape Marketing

6 Tips to Max Your Business Problem Solving Skills


If you can’t solve problems and enjoy it, you won’t make it as an entrepreneur. By definition, an entrepreneur is the first to undertake a given business, and firsts never happen without problems and people frustrations. The toughest problems are people problems, like personnel issues, but there are tough operational problems as well, such as vendor delays.
The real entrepreneurs I know are good at overcoming both people problems and business obstacles, and get satisfaction from the challenge. Some people think this is a talent that you must be born with, but experts disagree. You can definitely train yourself to be a problem solver, if you haven’t already. It’s a key skill for success in every business role, from accountant to customer support. Here are some basics rules:
1.     Practice active listening. Whether it’s a frustrated employee, or a dissatisfied customer, what you first hear is usually someone yelling with emotion or talking so fast the you don’t know what they are talking about. The first thing to do is resist the urge to vocally jump into the fray, and listen attentively without interruption. Often the person will solve their own problem as they are unloading.
2.     Promise action but manage expectations. Calmly commit to resolve the problem, but don’t immediately promise any given solution. Let the person know that the situation is not simple, and you need some time to investigate the circumstances and alternatives. Then give an expected time frame for an answer, and move to the next stage.
3.     Investigate thoroughly. There are at least two sides to every problem. Don’t assume anything, and gather facts from all relevant parties. If it’s a judgment or fair treatment question, practice your active listening with each party. If a problem requires special expertise, like a tax question, do your homework or call an expert.
4.     Provide regular progress updates to all. Status communication is critical, if the resolution time is going to be longer than one day, even if you have given an expected time from longer than one day. This is probably the most important step and probably the most neglected. If they hear nothing, unhappy people get progressively harder to satisfy.
5.     Make a timely decision. Meet your committed time frame for a resolution. Schedule enough face-to-face time (not email or text message) to lay out your understanding of the problem, facts you have assembled, options that you considered, and your decision reached, with reasoning behind it. If possible, let the person with the problem chose from alternatives, so you get more “buy-in.” Put the decision in writing to prevent ambiguity.
6.     Follow-up. No matter how smooth the resolution, you need to re-confirm the decision with affected parties within hours or days. This reaffirms you commitment to the process, their satisfaction, and avoids any secondary problems. If the problem was a business process, get the process update documented and communicated to all.
It’s critical to train everyone on your team on these principles, if you want an effective business. Your goal in all of this is to be a role model and get respect for you own position, as well as to empower team members to effectively solve problems for you and for your customers directly.
Problems happen, that’s part of life and people usually understand that. They are an everyday part of every business and personal environment. In fact, every business is about solutions to customer problems – no problems, no business.
Entrepreneurs who are great problem solvers within the business are the best prepared to solve their customers’ needs effectively as well. But in both cases, forcing a smile is not an alternative to the techniques described above. Your team and your customers will see right through it.

Fuente: Marty Zwilling, Startup Professionals

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

4 Real Benefits from International Expansion

by John R. Cryan


With sluggish US growth, international business expansion has become a vital strategic pillar for many companies. Yet, an international expansion strategy is fraught with uncertainties, risks and other obstacles. So is it worth it? That is, are companies that grow faster internationally rewarded by investors with better share price appreciation such that the risks are worth taking?
Fortunately, for executives longing to accelerate their international expansion, our capital market research indicates shareholders do in fact reward companies who grow faster outside of the US.
To determine this, we studied 202 current non-financial members of the S&P 500 from 2007 through 2011 that publish full data including detailed international revenue figures. The companies were separated into high, middle and low groups based on their rate of non-U.S. revenue growth and for each group we examined the median total shareholder return (TSR), reflecting dividends and share price appreciation.
The high international revenue growth group generated a 37 percent greater TSR compared to the low international revenue growth group and a 27 percent greater TSR compared to the middle international revenue growth group. U.S. companies with stronger international growth do tend to deliver significantly better returns to shareholders. However, companies that already have a large international presence should not rest on their laurels. We found no TSR outperformance by companies that simply maintained a large percentage of their revenue outside the US. Companies created superior shareholder returns by growing their international business.
The good news for executives aiming to expand their international growth plans is that success is not industry dependent. The high international revenue growth group included companies from over forty different industries including luxury goods leader Coach (COH), packaging giant Ball Corp (BLL) and biotechnology superstar Biogen Idec (BIIB). The diversity of the high performers provides confidence that most companies can succeed abroad if they focus on developing and executing a value creating strategy.
For most companies international growth is a value accelerator. On median, the high international revenue growth group derived several notable benefits from their expansion:
  1. They grew faster overall: Total revenue growth for the high international growth group was 6 percent and 8 percent per year faster than the middle and low international growth groups, respectively.
  2. They diversified their revenue stream: The share of their total revenue generated outside the US for the high international growth group increased by 7 percent which was 4 percent and 7 percent greater diversification than the middle and low growth groups, respectively. In fact, nearly one out of five delivered enough growth from their international operations to offset negative growth in their US business and still deliver an overall top-line increase.
  3. They improved their return on capital: The return on capital for the high international growth group improved by 1 percent which was 1 percent and 2 percent greater improvement in returns than experienced by the middle and low growth groups, respectively. This is in contrary to a commonly held belief that international expansion will lead to declining returns.
  4. They increased their reinvestment rate (defined as (Capex + R&D)/EBITDA): The high international growth group was able to redeploy 5 percent and 3 percent more of their cash flow than the middle and low groups, respectively.
A well designed growth strategy creates future capital deployment options. It is likely that companies with growing international businesses will be able to continue to redeploy more cash flow.
Rather than having to make trade-offs amongst the three value drivers of Growth, Returns, Reinvestment, the companies demonstrating greater international growth were able to improve on all three dimensions which led to significant shareholder returns.
Lastly, their international growth was likely perceived as “more valuable” to shareholders as not only is current growth stronger in many international economies, many “emerging markets” are less mature so the elevated growth is expected to remain lofty for a longer period of time.

The Case of Two Restaurant Strategies

Consider the strategies of two of the world’s largest restaurant companies. While not direct competitors, Yum! Brands (YUM) and Darden Restaurants (DRI)’s both seek to encourage patrons to consume more meals outside the home. However, their approach to international expansion couldn’t be more different.
While Darden grew 3 percent faster per year from 2007 through 2011, YUM’s TSR was more than four times greater. Why did investors bid YUM’s shares up so much on a relative basis for a slower growing company? After all, most valuation experts would tell you that if all else is equal, more growth should translate into greater share price appreciation.
In this case, all else is not equal. Darden’s revenue was completely US derived. Only recently has the company begun to test an international expansion strategy while YUM has been successfully operating abroad for many years.
YUM’s international growth strategy has been so successful that the company was able to offset an 8 percent revenue decline per year in its US business with robust 14 percent growth per year in its international segments. The company now generates over 70 percent of its revenue outside the US—a twenty percent change in revenue mix in just four years.
To support this bold international growth strategy, YUM has aligned its capital allocation process by increasing international capital expenditures by over 50 percent, while decelerating capital expenditures in the US. In addition, the company has reduced its financial risk by increasing liquidity and reducing its balance sheet debt, potentially allowing the company to bear more business risk inherent in operating abroad.
Shareholders continue to believe in the future of Yum!’s international expansion and thus far they are willing to tolerate the inherent risks of operating abroad so long as it continues to lead to robust growth.
While the nuances of every company’s international growth strategy will differ, our research findings indicate that most companies can succeed abroad if they focus on developing and executing a value creating strategy.
To do so, companies must fully evaluate their ability to generate a combination of positive returns and revenue growth that more than offset the inherent risks of operating abroad. The leading practice in this area is to conduct an elaborate assessment at a granular market by market, product by product assessment of the profit potential,
Ultimately, investors handsomely reward companies who can grow their business outside the US. Therefore it is critically important for executives to evaluate their strategy to ensure that international growth is encouraged and rewarded.

Fuente: ChiefExecutive.net

Competition: what the Government can learn from Business

SHOULD governments — of nations, states and towns — compete like business rivals?


The question is simpler to ask than to answer. But it reflects why conservatives and liberals disagree on many big issues facing the nation.
Most everyone agrees that competition is vital to a well-functioning market economy. Since the days of Adam Smith, economists have understood that the invisible hand of the marketplace works only if producers of goods and services vie with one another. Competition keeps prices low and provides an incentive to improve and innovate.
Granted, competition is not always good for producers. I produce economics textbooks. I curse the fact that my competitors are constantly putting out new, improved editions that threaten my market share. But knowing that I have to keep up with the Paul Krugmans and the Glenn Hubbards of the world keeps me on my toes. It makes me work harder, benefiting the customers — in this case, students. The upshot is that competition among economics textbooks makes learning the dismal science a bit less dismal.
For much the same reason, competition among governments leads to better governance. In choosing where to live, people can compare public services and taxes. They are attracted to towns that use tax dollars wisely. Competition keeps town managers alert. It prevents governments from exerting substantial monopoly power over residents. If people feel that their taxes exceed the value of their public services, they can go elsewhere. They can, as economists put it, vote with their feet.
The argument applies not only to people but also to capital. Because capital is more mobile than labor, competition among governments significantly constrains how capital is taxed. Corporations benefit from various government services, including infrastructure, the protection of property rights and the enforcement of contracts. But if taxes vastly exceed these benefits, businesses can — and often do — move to places offering a better mix of taxes and services.
This lesson is on the minds of policy makers today. Over the last few decades, corporate tax rates have fallen around the world. As of April 1, when Japan cut its tax rate, the United States was left with the world’s highest statutory corporate tax rate. This is one reason corporate tax reform is now high on the policy agenda. President Obama has proposed cutting the rate to 28 percent from its current 35 percent, while Mitt Romney — for whom I am an adviser — has proposed cutting it to 25 percent. While their proposals differ in some key details, it is noteworthy that they agree on the direction this rate should head.
Conservatives applaud such competition among governments. They are skeptical of government power, and they see competition as a check on its potential abuse. Because people and capital will flee from places where their tax dollars do not deliver commensurate value, government officials have little latitude to pursue personal agendas that are substantially adverse to any group of citizens.
This logic leads naturally to the principle of federalism. Because exiting a state or locality is easier than leaving the nation, some policy options should be available to state and local governments but not to the federal government. The founding fathers were no fools.
HEALTH care reform is a case in point. Anyone who finds the Massachusetts health insurance mandate objectionable can easily move to live-free-or-die New Hampshire. A national mandate leaves people with fewer options. This is one way the health reform advanced by Mr. Romney as governor differs from that pursued by President Obama, and why the Massachusetts law raises fewer constitutional objections than does the national one.
While conservatives embrace governmental competition, liberals have good reason to worry about it. The left has a more expansive view of the role of public policy. Liberals want the government not only to provide public services but also to redistribute economic resources. In the words of President Obama, they want to “spread the wealth around.”
Yet redistribution is harder when people and capital are free to move to other jurisdictions that offer better deals. If you are going to take from Peter to pay Paul, Peter may well decide to leave. It is perhaps no surprise that state and local tax systems are less progressive than the federal one.
Whether competition among governments is good or bad comes down to the philosophical questions of what you want government to do and how much you fear government power. If the government’s job is merely to provide services, like roads, schools and courts, competition among governmental producers may be as good a discipline as competition among private producers. But if government’s job is also to remedy many of life’s inequities, you may want a stronger centralized government, unchecked by competition.
These are two fundamentally different visions. The next election, and to some degree every election, is about which one voters find more compelling.

N. Gregory Mankiw is a professor of economics at Harvard.
He is advising Mitt Romney in the campaign for the Republican presidential nomination.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Además de seducir a los consumidores, las empresas deben "enamorar" a sus empleados
Flavia Foissac, Selectora de SESA Select, cuenta qué es el "Employer branding" y cómo lograr que los trabajadores sean embajadores de la compañía  

Para que una empresa lidere su mercado no basta con que seduzca a los consumidores sino que también debe enamorar a los trabajadores, tanto a quienes ya forma parte del staff como a aquellos que buscan empleo.
Así nace el Employer branding que consiste en la aplicación de las técnicas del marketing al mercado laboral para lograr que los profesionales de talento, pieza clave para toda compañía que quiera ser exitosa, la elijan para trabajar.
El Employer branding parte de definir los valores de la empresa como lugar en el que las personas trabajan y se desarrollan. Tiene que ver con la generación de expectativas de lo que significa trabajar en la empresa, pero también con la percepción que tienen de la experiencia de trabajo una vez que se incorporan.
Para generar la imagen de marca hay que poner en marcha un círculo virtuoso que va de la reputación externa al reconocimiento interno y viceversa.
Así, la satisfacción del empleado se percibirá fuera y hará que se confirme una imagen pública de marca como empleador.

A su vez, esta imagen pública contribuirá a hacer que los empleados se sientan orgullosos de la empresa en la que trabajan.
Para lograr que los empleados sean embajadores de la empresa, se debe aplicar cuatro palancas internas:

  1. Tener un propósito atractivo y trascendente ya que a identidad de la empresa, su cultura, sus valores más íntimos conforma marca como empleador.
  2. Implementar procesos de gestión de personas competitivos y alineados con las mejores prácticas del mercado, desde el reclutamiento hasta la desvinculación.
  3. Fortalecer la comunicación interna para favorecer una actitud positiva hacia la empresa como empleadora.
  4. La calidad de la estructura directiva y gerencial de la empresa, quienes tienen que priorizar y perfeccionar su management, reforzando así la propuesta de valores de la empresa a sus empleados y apoyando la puesta en valor de todo aquello que la empresa ofrece a su gente.
Muchas empresas importantes tienen, en teoría, las mismas prácticas de Recursos Humanos, pero generan experiencias muy distintas en materia de excelencia como lugar de trabajo. No importa tanto qué es lo que se hace, sino cómo se hace.
El feedback y el reconocimiento son los elementos más apreciados y enriquecedores de una experiencia laboral, pero las prácticas utilizadas pueden entrañar una mera transacción de rutina o bien una experiencia amigable.
Lo que cuenta es qué valores y qué comportamientos están en la base de las interacciones entre los directivos y los empleados.
La compañía, en tanto, debe comunicar externamente su propuesta de valor como empleador a través de un plan específico orientado al mercado laboral, porque la única forma de trascender que tiene es transmitiendo su legado, su leyenda y razón de ser.
Fuente: Emprendimientos Corporativos S.A.

Monday, May 21, 2012

George Washington University Hits Alumni Milestone: with this year’s Commencement, more than 250,000 GW Alumni will be living around the World

May 17, 2012
On May 20, more than 7,000 students will officially become GW alumni at George Washington’s 2012 Commencement ceremony, marking the first time the university has more than a quarter of a million living alumni in its community.
“Hitting the quarter-of-a-million milestone is another indicator that GW is an institution on the move,” said Jim Core, M.A. ’96, president of the GW Alumni Association. “We now have a quarter of a million reasons to keep telling the GW story so that more of our alums feel inspired to engage with what is happening at the university.”
GW alumni are living in 150 countries around the world, and as a whole donated and pledged almost $30 million to the university during the 2011 fiscal year. 
Prominent alumni include Gen. Colin Powell, M.B.A. ’71; AMC Entertainment CEO and President Gerardo Lopez, B.B.A. ’80; and actress and GW Board of Trustee member Kerry Washington, B.A. ’98.
“Having achieved the impressive milestone of a quarter of a million alumni, we are excited to use this opportunity to emphasize what a powerful network we have in our worldwide alumni body,” said Adrienne Rulnick, associate vice president for alumni relations and development.
Alumni remain connected with the university via social media outlets, with more than 20,000 in the GWAA Linked-In group and more than 38,000 in the Alumni Online Community. The number of connected alumni could fill the Charles E. Smith Center 10 times over.
Mr. Core said thousands of alums are also “investing in the next generation” by mentoring current students and fellow alumni. More than 1,200 alumni have registered as career advisers with the GW Alumni Network.
“The Alumni Association provides opportunities to connect professionally and personally with fellow alums to help people reach their goals or simply make a friend in a new town,” he said. “Valuable personal and professional connections grow every day because of GW connections.”
And for some alumni, their ties to the university stretch over multiple degrees and generations.
Alumni Glenn Geelhoed and George McCullars are among a select group of approximately 100 GW alumni who have earned four or more degrees from the university.
A professor of surgery and international medical education at GW, Dr. Geelhoed, M.A. ’91, M.P.H. ’93, M.A. ’95, M.Phil. ’02, Ed.D.’09, said he believes learning and life are “pretty much synonymous.”
“I’ve crossed a lot of finish lines – I’ve run 138 marathons – and I can tell you the final tape isn’t why you run the race. I’ve crossed quite a few podiums at GW too, and that isn’t the finish of your education, it just provides you the tools to start,” he said. “That’s why they call it commencement; it’s a beginning, not an end.”
Dr. McCullars, M.S. ’71, M.Phil. ’74, M.D. ’75, Ph.D. ’76, still remembers some of his GW mentors, including Nobel Prize winner Julius Axelrod, Ph.D. ’55, NIH investigator William Jacoby, Neurology Department Chair Sean O’Reilly, and Biochemistry Department Chair Carleton Treadwell.
“It was worth all the effort…I didn’t do this for the earning capacity, I did it for the learning experience afforded me at GW,” said Dr. McCullars, who currently works in private practice in Mobile, Ala. “Every single day was exciting.”
Emeritus trustee Sheldon Cohen, A.A.’48, B.A.’50, J.D.’52, remains connected to the university more than 65 years after he first attended as an undergraduate in 1946. Mr. Cohen, a former member of the adjunct faculty in the GW Law School and former chairman of the GW Board of Trustees, established the Faye F. and Sheldon S. Cohen Scholarship with his wife in 1992 to support scholarships for full-time law students. Three of his children and a son-in-law hold degrees from the university as well.
Mr. Cohen, who attended the GW Law School on a full scholarship, said George Washington helped prepare him for a career in tax law, which included being appointed the youngest commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service in 1964.
“I was a poor kid who could do well in school but if I had gone to night school, I wouldn’t have been able to do the things I’ve done. That [scholarship] was a gift from GW,” he said. “My kids have done well at GW, and we’ve had fun.”
The desire many alumni have to stay tied to the university is a result of their pride for their alma mater, said Mr. Core.
“Our alums are excited to be part of a leading university that is firmly on the global stage,” he said. “GW alumni, students, professors and researchers are influencing complex public policy decisions and advancing artistic and scientific endeavors around the world. Our list of notable alumni proves that Colonials are extremely successful and make outsized contributions in the public and private sectors in the U.S. and around the world.”
“This quarter-of-a-million milestone underscores to our students that the GW experience continues beyond graduation,” he added. “I am especially thrilled that the class of 2012 is joining our global and lifelong alumni community.”

GEORGE WASHINGTON TODAY

Division of External Relations
2121 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20052
Phone: (202) 994-1000

Thursday, May 17, 2012

The George Washington University holds groundbreaking for new SPHHS building

May 17, 2012

GW President Steven Knapp, SPHHS Dean Lynn Goldman, D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray and Board of Trustees Chair W. Russell Ramsey were among those celebrating the groundbreaking for a new SPHHS building.
The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services celebrated a ceremonial groundbreaking for its new home Wednesday.
The ceremony was held on University Yard because the demolition of the Warwick Building on 2300 K Street – the site of the new SPHHS building – is still ongoing.
SPHHS Dean Lynn Goldman said the new building, which is expected to open in the spring 2014 semester, will revolutionize science, scholarship, service and the student experience in public health at GW.
“The construction of this building marks the first time in our history that the school will all be together under one roof, and as dean I’m so proud to be a part of this exciting transformation,” she said.
During his introductory remarks, George Washington President Steven Knapp thanked Dr. Goldman for bringing the project to fruition and for her leadership of the District’s only public health school. According to Dr. Knapp, SPHHS has the fastest growing research arm across all of GW’s schools, and the new building will serve as a central location for research in public health and collaboration between SPHHS and government and non-governmental organizations. Dr. Knapp also thanked the many SPHHS students who attended D.C. Zoning Commission hearings advocating for the new building.
The 115,000-square-foot building, which will be home to more than 200 full- and part-time faculty, 1,200 graduate and undergraduate students and staff, will feature state-of-the-art classrooms, research labs, departmental office space and conference rooms and an interior central atrium. The building, which will have seven floors above ground and two below, will be the first GW building visible to visitors who approach campus from Washington Circle and Pennsylvania Avenue.
FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg said the location for the new building speaks to why the school is unique amongst the nation’s public health schools.
“Located blocks from the White House, Pan American Health Organization, Department of Health and Human Service, the World Bank, leading NGOs in health and health policy as well as very important Washington, D.C., organizations, our own health department and our own community organizations…it will clearly be well positioned to make a difference locally, nationally and globally,” said Dr. Hamburg.
The public health community will need the expertise of GW graduates, Dr. Hamburg said, as the world confronts an unprecedented array of challenges including emerging infectious disease threats and antibiotics resistance, chronic disease threats such as obesity and diabetes and the growing burden of disease associated with the nation’s aging population.
“Public health matters to each and every one of us, the communities we live in and the health, safety and well-being of our globe,” she said. “Public health must be a local and global enterprise.”
The notion of public health needing to be multifaceted is recognized by Dr. Goldman’s vision for SPHHS, Dr. Hamburg said.
“Her background as a scientist, government leader, advocate, educator and mentor uniquely positions her to understand the challenges and the opportunities of working within the political, scientific and the educational frameworks that shape public health accomplishments,” Dr. Hamburg said. “I’m confident that under her leadership the future building will be a home not only to labs and classes but above all to real-world ideas and solutions to some of the most pressing public health challenges.”
The building will be constructed with a range of green and sustainable materials, and the project will target a minimum of Gold certification under the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System.
The ceremony brought together about 150 students, faculty, staff, school administrators, the SPHHS Dean’s Council, GW Board of Trustees members, alumni and others. Dr. Knapp and Provost Steven Lerman joined Dr. Goldman and other GW administrators, student leaders and department chairs in ceremonially breaking ground on the new building.
“We expect public health to increasingly dominate the landscape of this nation,” said D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray, B.A. ’64. “What an enormous contribution this school will make to the university and to the District of Columbia.”